lmw1985 wrote:JustAGlance wrote:I have learned one thing, EACH department, EACH job code has it's share of ups and downs and stress. But to assume one has it easier is a HUGE mistake in this company.
If all jobs suck equally (which they don't) then why do the positions have different pay levels? The way I look at it... if everyone hated their job at Wal-Mart as much as I did then there would be no long term employees there.
I know how the old saying goes, "The grass is always greener on the other side" but I don't think I'm wrong when I say being paid a level 3 to work in the backroom is better than being paid a level 2 to work on the sales floor. I have done picks for my department before they changed the rules so it's not like I don't know what an ICS associate does. Being paid a level 3 to cashier is better than being paid a level 2 to be a back-up cashier. (especially because when the store is dead then the cashiers can stand around by the register whereas I still have to work on the sales floor stocking and zoning) If they would have given me a job I actually liked then perhaps I wouldn't have been so desperate to find a different job.
I think that you both make excellent points, and I also think someone in Bentonville is missing the boat. As for being your typical "level 2" sales floor associate that has to "back-up cashier" (a level 3 pay grade), that just isn't right. Even as a level 2 pay grade, I don't mind helping out there once in a while, but it gets to a point where it's happening way too often, especially when there's tons of projects to do, and/or customer service within the departments. What's worse is that half of our floor associates aren't register-trained, and out of the ones who are, about half of them are in areas such as Electronics & Sporting Goods, where they apparently are exempt from being called up front unless it's extremely busy. What really gets me mad is that I'll go by Electronics and see 3 or 4 associates standing around talking, so I know they have the coverage (compared to other areas). Meanwhile, we have level 2 associates in other departments who are often times the only person covering multiple departments, and they are the ones who get yanked up to cashier most often. They are also the ones who get chewed out when their tasks aren't done on time.
Not only do we not get paid as much as regular cashiers, but there are other consequences. For one thing, if you get have a coaching on record, or a "below expectations" evaluation, you aren't even allowed to move up from your level 2 position to be a cashier (in spite of the fact that you get yanked up there quite often). Also, sometimes your evaluation takes into account how often you go up front to cashier, and if you are good at it, you'll probably get a meets (or maybe an exceeds if you are able to get your regular tasks done PLUS cashiering when called). However, with some managers, even if you go up to cashier, they'll still hold the fact that you're not getting your tasks done against you, and rate you "below expectations" despite the fact that you probably "exceed expectations" in that you do cashier, even though you might not "meet expectations" within the department. We have had people who have WANTED to be cashiers, but have had to work the sales floor instead, and have been coached (or given sub-par evalutions) because they were up front so much that they weren't able to get their department tasks done. When they asked to transfer to a cashier, they were told that they couldn't because of the active coaching and/or evaluation on file. In my opinion, that sucks.
The other thing that I think stinks is that those who back-up cashier, don't even have cashier listed as a "secondary job code", which means they don't get the benefit of the CBLs to learn the basics (and more complicated tasks to cashiering). Now, I believe that if you work in Sporting Goods and Electronics, you do get those CBLs because you have to know how to cashier just to work those departments. But for most level 2 positions (like Housewares, HBA, Pets, etc.), you don't get those CBLs, so you just get minimal training, and you only go up there when it's busy, so you really don't get much time to learn what you need to know.
We also have the issue where half of our Garden Center associates (which is also a level 3 position) don't know how to cashier, and that's not right. If some level 2 people have to cashier, then almost all level 3 people should have to. Out of our current group of Garden Center associates, I think only 3 or 4 know how to run registers. Keep in mind, that our Garden Center can use up to 4 registers (compared to other stores that have only 1 or 2), so I don't see the big deal with those people learning how to cashier just to help out with cashiering in the Garden Center for a few minutes when it gets real busy.
Personally, I think there should be some kind of incentive for everyone to know how to backup cashier, whether it be 20 or 30 cents per hour higher than their "normal" hourly wage would be, or being upgraded to "level 3" job code since they have to go through the aggrevation of cashiering plus their normal duties.
I could go on and on about this, but my basic premise as far as the cashiering situation is this. I don't think it's right that "Level 4" associates in Electronics & Sporting Goods (could add Level 3 associates in Garden Center) get to stand around "chit-chatting", while the level 2 associates have tons of work to do (often one person having to cover multiple departments). And it's usually the level 2 associates who get called up front to cashier first. I am going to raise a real "stink" about this to a store manager (or at least some assistant manager) relatively "soon". It might not be this week or next week, but it's going to happen pretty soon.
As far as the level 3 people working the backroom, I don't expect them to have to cashier, because they need to maintain the backroom properly, because if the backroom falls apart, the rest of the store probably will fall apart as well. I'll admit that I haven't worked the backroom much, so I don't know what all they have to go through. I've heard that they go through a lot of hell as well, with the bin accuracy being low, a lot of negative on-hands, and of course the critical picks. In theory, the idea of having all items scanned in (as opposed to the old way of things being in random spots where nobody knew where they were) is a good idea, but the execution is not quite up to par. Personally, I think the system worked better when we had some of the ICS team working on the sales floor. If you want to know my suggestion on how to fix the backroom problems, this would be a partial list:
1) Add back the 11-8 ICS shift because this is where the customer traffic is heaviest and when we need the best possible communication for resolving possible "outs" within the departments.
2) Have two different "job codes" for the ICS team. Half of the people work in various areas on the sales floor, while half of them work the back room. However, all of them should know how to work both areas.
3) Give all ICS team members (not just the team lead) walkie-talkies to enable better communication between the sales floor members and the backroom members. While we're at it, give all department managers walkie-talkies as well for better communication with the ICS team members when they need a problem resolved.
4) I also think that everyone (at least the ICS team and any supervisor such as department manager on up) should be able to create manual picks when they see the need. Although it is true that in general the system is pretty good at giving us picks that will actually go up, sometimes they don't give us a pick when we really NEED it. I think we're relying too much on a computer program here. Furthermore, we're not letting the human element of those who are actually out there on the sales floor and see the outs generate a pick that might otherwise be forgotten.
There's various things customers will complain about within the store such as:
1) No one to help dip fish, mix paint, cut fabric, etc.
2) Checkout lines are too long for them
3) Customer can't find the location of an item or department, and no one was nearby to help them with it.
4) Item customer is looking for is not on the shelf. Sometimes it's because we're flat out, but more are on order tonight or the next night. Sometimes, it's because there's a warehouse outage and we might not get any more in for a while. And then there are times where it's in the back room, but because the system didn't generate the pick, it doesn't come out because we can't do manual picks. As far as I'm concerned, there's not much that I personally can do if we're out of a particular item both on the sales floor or in the back room. But if the item is empty on the sales floor but we have it in stock in the backroom, I'm one of those people who prefers to take a "pro-active" approach (meaning put it on the pick list manually instead of assuming the system is going to automatically generate the pick) rather than take a "re-active" approach (meaning that the pick isn't generated until after a customer asks if we have the item in stock). However, at the same time, I don't want the same pick to be generated twice, so if I HAVE to do manual picks, I usually don't do them until all the current picks in the department have already been stocked or labeled as "overstock". I also like to make sure the area that I am "picking" from is zoned reasonably well first so I can get an accurate count of how much of a certain item I need.
There's nothing more frustrating from a customer standpoint than when the product he's looking for is empty and there is no associate nearby to answer the question as to if we even have the item in stock. And it basically boils down to staffing. As we all know, we're short on the sales floor as is, and the few who are on the sales floor get called up to cashier quite a bit, which further complicates the problem.
The bottom line though is that not all jobs are created equal, and it seems like certain people get paid more for doing less. But the real issue is overall customer service within the store, and I feel (and I'm sure many others within the store, as well as on this site, would agree) that we are not giving our customers the service that they deserve. In my opinion, that sucks. If I was a manager for this company, I would not tolerate that for long. If that means I have to go out to the floor to work the freight to make sure it gets done, even as a manager, I would do it. I think that's the root of the problem. The customer service is awful because the staffing is a joke, and also because most of the managers try to act like "bosses" rather than coming out and helping when they certain areas aren't covered on a particular day.